Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible

On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:57:09 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> hm, could you please merge this ontop of the stacktrace-output 
> beautification patch below that Andrew already has in his post-mm2 tree? 

Is OK - it's better that Jan's new patches apply directly to his present
ones.  I merged them in that order, fixed up the fallout.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm2
• Next by Date: [Patch] restore correct print_len calculation in printk
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding is possible
• Next by thread: Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (Jes Sorensen)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]