Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:04 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > >> Do you have any documented requirements for container resource
> > >> management?
> > >> Is there a minimum list of features and nice to have features for
> > >> containers
> > >> as far as resource management is concerned?
> > >
> > > Sure! You can check OpenVZ project (http://openvz.org) for example of
> > > required resource management. BTW, I must agree with other people here
> > > who noticed that per-process resource management is really useless and
> > > hard to use :(
>
> I totally agree.
>
> > I'll take a look at the references. I agree with you that it will be
> > useful to have resource management for a group of tasks.
For Resource Management to be useful it must depend on Resource Control.
Resource Control depends on per-process accounting. Per-process accounting,
when abstracted sufficiently, may enable higher level routines, preferrably
in userland, to extend functionality at will. All efforts should really go
into the successful abstraction of per-process accounting.
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
