On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 00:04 -0400, Xin Zhao wrote:
> Until kernel 2.6.16, I think NFS still access metadata synchronously,
> which may impact performance significantly. Several years ago, paper
> "metadata update performance in file systems" already suggested using
> asynchronous mode in metadata access.
...and how many NFS implementations have you seen based on that paper?
> I am curious why NFS does not adopt this suggestion? Can someone explain this?
a) NFS permissions are checked by the _server_, not the client.
b) Cache consistency requirements are _much_ more stringent for
asynchronous operation. Think for instance about an asynchronous
mkdir(): how should the client guarantee exclusive semantics (i.e. that
mkdir either creates a new directory or returns an EEXIST error)? how
should it guarantee that the server will have enough disk space to
satisfy your request? how should it guarantee that nobody will change
the permissions on the parent directory before the metadata was synced
to disk?,...
People are considering how to implement this sort of thing using the
NFSv4 concept of delegations and applying them to directories. It is not
yet obvious how all the details will be solved.
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
