Re: 2.6.17rc emu10k1 regression.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

 > > modprobe.conf has ..
 > > alias snd-card-0 snd-emu10k1
 > > options snd-card-0 index=0
 > > options snd-emu10k1 index=0
 > > remove snd-emu10k1 { /usr/sbin/alsactl store 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 || : ; }; /sbin/modprobe -r --ignore-remove snd-emu10k1
 > > 
 > > What changed ?
 > 
 > Nothing from ALSA side.  Maybe the module loading mechanism (or slot
 > order) was changed on your system.
 > 
 > The scenario is:
 > 
 > intel8x0 driver is first loaded on the first empty slot (index=0)
 > before snd-emu10k1.  Since you set index=0 module option for
 > snd-emu10k1, it tried to load on the same slot but failed.
 > 
 > A workaround is to set index=1 option for snd-intel8x0 in addition,
 > for using emu10k1 as the primary card.

The modprobe.conf also had an index=1 entry already for the intel driver.

		Dave
-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux