Re: [RFC PATCH (take #2)] i386: kill CONFIG_REGPARM completely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/20/06, Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]> wrote:
Take #2.

Kill of CONFIG_REGPARM completely.


diff --git a/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt b/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
index f39c9d7..ac11b81 100644
--- a/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
+++ b/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
@@ -62,9 +62,8 @@ consider the following facts about the L
       - different structures can contain different fields
       - Some functions may not be implemented at all, (i.e. some locks
        compile away to nothing for non-SMP builds.)
-      - Parameter passing of variables from function to function can be
-       done in different ways (the CONFIG_REGPARM option controls
-       this.)
+      - Parameter passing of variables from function to function can
+       be done in different ways.

Why not kill those 2 lines too? Now that non-regparm is gone, it
doesnt make sense to say there are different ways to pass parameters,
there is only regparm now, right?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux