* Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ingo, Andrew, I think these are minor logic fixes and comments that
> correct a patch that has already been pushed to 2.6.17- and I would
> like them short circuited to mainline if everyone is comfortable with
> it.
the patch looks good, and it certainly wont cause stability problems
(this type of code typically doesnt). It may cause interactivity
problems, but then again this affects boundary conditions, so i'm fairly
optimistic. So if we have say more than say 4 days until 2.6.17 i'd
suggest it for immediate inclusion.
> Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
