On Wed, 10 May 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I can't reproduce this, gcc 4.1 gives me: > > CC [M] init/test.o > init/test.c: In function 'warn_here': > init/test.c:14: warning: 'x' is used uninitialized in this function > init/test.c: In function 'but_not_here': > init/test.c:23: warning: 'y' is used uninitialized in this function > OK, then it's fixed. I just noticed I'm using gcc 4.0.1 -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/9] nsproxy: incorporate fs namespace
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- Index(es):