Re: [PATCH] mm: cleanup swap unused warning

On 5/10/06, Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:

+/*
+ * A swap entry has to fit into a "unsigned long", as
+ * the entry is hidden in the "index" field of the
+ * swapper address space.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
 typedef struct {
        unsigned long val;
 } swp_entry_t;
+#else
+typedef struct {
+       unsigned long val;
+} swp_entry_t __attribute__((__unused__));
+#endif

Or we could make swap_free() an empty static inline function for the
non-CONFIG_SWAP case.

                                                    Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] mm: cleanup swap unused warning
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: cleanup swap unused warning
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: cleanup swap unused warning
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm: cleanup swap unused warning
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm: cleanup swap unused warning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]