Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions

Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Sun, 7 May 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:

Trond wrote an alternate patch for the actual problem which I sent separately, but it would probably be good to have more safety in the slab layer by default regardless.

And here's Trond's suggested locks.c fix.

I can confirm that it does fix the two issues.

--
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/10] make stop_machine_run accept cpumask
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]