>-----Original Message----- >From: Corey Minyard [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:40 PM >To: Gross, Mark >Cc: Alan Cox; [email protected]; LKML; Carbonari, >Steven; Ong, Soo Keong; Wang, Zhenyu Z >Subject: Re: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS > >Gross, Mark wrote: > >>> >>> >>> >> >>Done. >>Signed-off-by: Mark Gross >> >> >>--mgross >> >> >Yes, this is what I was talking about. I believe the mode of >module_param should be 444, since modifying this after the module is >loaded won't do anything. Also, it might be nice to print something >different in the "force" case. How about printing nothing like it used too? See attached. Signed-off-by: Mark Gross --mgross
Attachment:
e752x_edac.patch
Description: e752x_edac.patch
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS
- From: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>
- Re: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix evaluation of skip_for_load in move_tasks()
- Next by Date: [PATCH 0/2] mm: OOM killer changes
- Previous by thread: Re: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS
- Next by thread: Re: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS
- Index(es):
 |