On Tue, 25 April 2006 17:33:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> To state what I said earlier: the use of a global hypfs_sblk is
> problematic because now we can only have the filesystem mounted once. So
> I would really like to see some other way of updating. How do you feel
> about the s_ops->fs_remount thing?
It sounds as if part of hypfs is a global resource. Maybe the code
could be split between a global get-and-store-data part and a
per-filesystem representation part?
Jörn
--
Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability is in the opponent.
-- Sun Tzu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
