Re: [PATCH] reverse pci config space restore order

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:51:01PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> it has a second drawback: it assumes all devices HAVE a driver, which
> isn't normally the case...

Yeah, I guess there's a call for keeping a pci_save_entire_state type 
call and getting pci_device_suspend to use that in the no-driver case 
(also for the "Make my driver work again quickly" case, but still)

-- 
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] reverse pci config space restore order
    • From: "Yu, Luming" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] reverse pci config space restore order
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] reverse pci config space restore order
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: EMT64T build error
• Next by Date: Re: __FILE__ gets expanded to absolute pathname
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] reverse pci config space restore order
• Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] reverse pci config space restore order
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]