Re: [rfc][patch] radix-tree: small data structure

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 01:46:24AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> >With the previous patch, the radix_tree_node budget on my 64-bit
> >desktop is cut from 20MB to 10MB. This patch should cut it again
> >by nearly a factor of 4 (haven't verified, but 98ish % of files
> >are under 64K).
> >
> >I wonder if this would be of any interest for those who enable
> >CONFIG_BASE_SMALL?
> 
> Bah, wrong patch.

I like it.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [rfc][patch] radix-tree: small data structure
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [rfc][patch] radix-tree: small data structure
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 'make headers_install' kbuild target.
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-rc1: kernel only boots one CPU on HT system
• Previous by thread: Re: [rfc][patch] radix-tree: small data structure
• Next by thread: cpu frequency scaling on celeron laptop
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]