> > It seems including atomic.h inside compiler.h is a bit
> tricky (might have interdependency).
> >
> > Can we just live with int instead of atomic_t? We don't
> really care about losing a count occasionally..
>
> It's nice so you don't have to fool around with locking ..
> The atomic_t structure is pretty simple thought . I think it
> boils down to just an int anyway .
We could move atomic_t into a separate atomic_type.h? I just want to make sure before I mess with the file structure..
Hua
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
