I've been working on some code that records all the data for output to a
proc entry . It's pretty light weight .. I'll send it once it's
finished ..
Daniel
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 14:02 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
> Maybe something like this might be a useful debug option to detect unwise likely()/unlikely() usage?
>
> This is a quick hack (not submitted for inclusion), but it works on my box and detected certain points after boot. Anyone likes this idea?
>
> The reason I had to add printk_debug_likely() is that using printk directly gives compile error. It seems not to like asmlinkage for some reason..I guess likely/unlikely are too fundamental macros and the dependency gets too messy. Or maybe it could be fixed in a way I've not found.
>
> It increases kernel size by about 10%, but hey, it's a debugg option. :-)
>
> Sample print:
>
> possible (un)likely misuse at include/asm/mmu_context.h:32/switch_mm()
> <c011b644> printk_debug_likely+0x25/0x31 <c02b3092> schedule+0xb04/0xefa
> <c02b457b> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x35a/0x89e <c016c0fd> real_lookup+0x1f/0xb3
> <c016c0fd> real_lookup+0x1f/0xb3 <c016c512> do_lookup+0x50/0xe8
> <c016d14b> __link_path_walk+0xba1/0x125f <c016d8a6> link_path_walk+0x9d/0x166
> <c014b911> __handle_mm_fault+0x2fd/0x35b <c01ca29e> _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x22/0x2c
> <c016d5c2> __link_path_walk+0x1018/0x125f <c016d8a6> link_path_walk+0x9d/0x166
> <c014b911> __handle_mm_fault+0x2fd/0x35b <c01ce9fe> strncpy_from_user+0x94/0xb3
> <c016dee7> do_path_lookup+0x35c/0x4d2 <c016e385> __user_walk_fd+0x84/0x9b
> <c0167ae1> vfs_stat_fd+0x15/0x3c <c014b911> __handle_mm_fault+0x2fd/0x35b
> <c0168091> sys_stat64+0xf/0x23 <c0113fea> do_page_fault+0x30d/0x753
> <c01ceefd> copy_to_user+0x113/0x11c <c0126ee6> sys_rt_sigprocmask+0xae/0xc1
> <c01035cb> sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
> possible (un)likely misuse at kernel/sched.c:1638/context_switch()
> <c011b644> printk_debug_likely+0x25/0x31 <c02b3025> schedule+0xa97/0xefa
> <c011ddcd> do_exit+0x75b/0x765 <c011dec4> sys_exit_group+0x0/0xd
> <c01035cb> sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
> possible (un)likely misuse at kernel/softlockup.c:59/softlockup_tick()
> <c011b644> printk_debug_likely+0x25/0x31 <c0138f78> softlockup_tick+0x88/0xf5
> <c0123dcd> update_process_times+0x35/0x57 <c0106133> timer_interrupt+0x3d/0x60
> <c013919c> handle_IRQ_event+0x21/0x4a <c01392f7> __do_IRQ+0x132/0x1e7
> <c0104d86> do_IRQ+0x9c/0xab <c01037fe> common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> possible (un)likely misuse at kernel/sched.c:1645/context_switch()
> <c011b644> printk_debug_likely+0x25/0x31 <c02b3236> schedule+0xca8/0xefa
> <c0130d33> enqueue_hrtimer+0x5b/0x80 <c02b57f5> do_nanosleep+0x3b/0xc0
> <c0131092> hrtimer_nanosleep+0x45/0xe6 <c01680b4> sys_lstat64+0xf/0x23
> <c013102a> hrtimer_wakeup+0x0/0x18 <c01cf021> copy_from_user+0x11b/0x142
> <c0131179> sys_nanosleep+0x46/0x4e <c01035cb> sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index f23d3c6..a6df5f7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -58,9 +58,32 @@ #endif
> * build go below this comment. Actual compiler/compiler version
> * specific implementations come from the above header files
> */
> +#define CONFIG_DEBUG_LIKELY
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LIKELY
> +extern int printk_debug_likely(const char *fmt, ...);
> +extern int debug_likely_count_min_thresh;
> +extern int debug_likely_print_max_thresh;
> +#define __check_likely(x, v, uv) \
> + ({ static int _ckl_print_nr = 0; \
> + static unsigned int _ckl_s[2]; \
> + int _ckl_r = !!(x); \
> + _ckl_s[_ckl_r]++; \
> + if ((_ckl_s[v] == _ckl_s[uv]) && (_ckl_s[v] > debug_likely_count_min_thresh) \
> + && (_ckl_print_nr < debug_likely_print_max_thresh)) { \
> + _ckl_print_nr++; \
> + printk_debug_likely("possible (un)likely misuse at %s:%d/%s()\n", \
> + __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__); \
> + } \
> + _ckl_r; })
> +#else
> +#define __check_likely(x, v, uv) __builtin_expect(!!(x), v)
> +#endif
> +
> +#define likely(x) __check_likely(x, 1, 0)
> +#define unlikely(x) __check_likely(x, 0, 1)
>
> -#define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
> -#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
> +//#define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
> +//#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>
> /* Optimization barrier */
> #ifndef barrier
> diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
> index c056f33..cc09dca 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -602,6 +602,30 @@ out:
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(printk);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vprintk);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LIKELY
> +int debug_likely_count_min_thresh = 100;
> +int debug_likely_print_max_thresh = 1;
> +int printk_debug_likely(const char *fmt, ...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + static atomic_t recurse = ATOMIC_INIT(1); /* as a mutex */
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&recurse)) {
> + va_list args;
> +
> + va_start(args, fmt);
> + r = vprintk(fmt, args);
> + va_end(args);
> + dump_stack();
> + }
> + atomic_inc(&recurse);
> +
> + return r;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(debug_likely_count_min_thresh);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(debug_likely_print_max_thresh);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(printk_debug_likely);
> +#endif
> +
> #else
>
> asmlinkage long sys_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len)
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
