Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> >> Well then, have a look at http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/
>> >
>> >hmm on first sight that seems to be basically an extension to the
>> >existing capability() code... rather than a 'real' LSM module. Am I
>> >missing something here?
>> 
>> (So what's the definition for a "real" LSM module?)
>
>No idea, try submitting the patch :)
>
Because it's too big, you only get URLs:

[01/02] http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/mtadm_hooks-2.6.17-rc2.diff  137KB
[02/02] http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/mtadm_module-2.6.17-rc2.diff  27KB

Don't mention CodingStyle, I know. This is just a post to respond to the
topic on why noone submitted it earlier.
I already see it coming...


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux