Problem:
To help distribute high priority tasks evenly across the available CPUs
move_tasks() does not, under some circumstances, skip tasks whose load
weight is bigger than the designated amount. Because the highest
priority task on the busiest queue may be on the expired array it may be
moved as a result of this mechanism. Apart from not being the most
desirable way to redistribute the high priority tasks (we'd rather move
the second highest priority task), there is a risk that this could set
up a loop with this task bouncing backwards and forwards between the two
queues. (This latter possibility can be demonstrated by running a
nice==-20 CPU bound task on an otherwise quiet 2 CPU system.)
Solution:
Modify the mechanism so that it does not override skip for the highest
priority task on the CPU. Of course, if there are more than one tasks
at the highest priority then it will allow the override for one of them
as this is a desirable redistribution of high priority tasks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
Peter
--
Peter Williams [email protected]
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
Index: MM-2.6.17-rc1-mm3/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- MM-2.6.17-rc1-mm3.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-04-21 12:19:30.000000000 +1000
+++ MM-2.6.17-rc1-mm3/kernel/sched.c 2006-04-21 12:26:54.000000000 +1000
@@ -2029,6 +2029,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(task_t *p, runqueue
return 1;
}
+#define rq_best_prio(rq) min((rq)->curr->prio, (rq)->best_expired_prio)
/*
* move_tasks tries to move up to max_nr_move tasks and max_load_move weighted
* load from busiest to this_rq, as part of a balancing operation within
@@ -2043,7 +2044,9 @@ static int move_tasks(runqueue_t *this_r
{
prio_array_t *array, *dst_array;
struct list_head *head, *curr;
- int idx, pulled = 0, pinned = 0, this_min_prio;
+ int idx, pulled = 0, pinned = 0, this_best_prio, busiest_best_prio;
+ int busiest_best_prio_seen;
+ int skip_for_load; /* skip the task based on weighted load issues */
long rem_load_move;
task_t *tmp;
@@ -2052,7 +2055,13 @@ static int move_tasks(runqueue_t *this_r
rem_load_move = max_load_move;
pinned = 1;
- this_min_prio = this_rq->curr->prio;
+ this_best_prio = rq_best_prio(this_rq);
+ busiest_best_prio = rq_best_prio(busiest);
+ /*
+ * Enable handling of the case where there is more than one task
+ * with the best priority.
+ */
+ busiest_best_prio_seen = busiest_best_prio == busiest->curr->prio;
/*
* We first consider expired tasks. Those will likely not be
@@ -2097,7 +2106,10 @@ skip_queue:
* skip a task if it will be the highest priority task (i.e. smallest
* prio value) on its new queue regardless of its load weight
*/
- if ((idx >= this_min_prio && tmp->load_weight > rem_load_move) ||
+ skip_for_load = tmp->load_weight > rem_load_move;
+ if (skip_for_load && idx < this_best_prio)
+ skip_for_load = busiest_best_prio_seen || idx != busiest_best_prio;
+ if (skip_for_load ||
!can_migrate_task(tmp, busiest, this_cpu, sd, idle, &pinned)) {
if (curr != head)
goto skip_queue;
@@ -2119,8 +2131,10 @@ skip_queue:
* and the prescribed amount of weighted load.
*/
if (pulled < max_nr_move && rem_load_move > 0) {
- if (idx < this_min_prio)
- this_min_prio = idx;
+ if (idx < this_best_prio)
+ this_best_prio = idx;
+ if (idx == busiest_best_prio)
+ busiest_best_prio_seen = 1;
if (curr != head)
goto skip_queue;
idx++;
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
