When you google for such messages, you can find a lot of people asking, but nobody seems to have an answer. That's why I ask this list, where the Godfathers Of Linux reside, and maybe someone hears my prayer and could explain us sheep what you should do in such a case. Increase the HZ from 250 to 1000, or decrease to 100? Or maybe setting the preemption model from server to voluntary or preemptible? Or is that whining to be ignored, and if yes, what is this message for at all? Please give us wisdom, and we will spread your word. Amen. Answers please per PM, I'm not on this list. mfg zmi *or could you ask in a nicer way?* -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660/4156531 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi3.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: 44A3 C1EC B71E C71A B4C2 9AA6 C818 847C 55CB A4EE // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x55CBA4EE
Attachment:
pgpzhYgqqdYck.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rtc: lost some interrupts at 256Hz
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: rtc: lost some interrupts at 256Hz
- From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtc: lost some interrupts at 256Hz
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Netlink and user-space buffer pointers
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Netlink and user-space buffer pointers
- Previous by thread: [Announce] sg3_utils-1.20 available
- Next by thread: Re: rtc: lost some interrupts at 256Hz
- Index(es):
 |