On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 00:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > A string corresponding to the tcpa_pc_event_id POST_CONTENTS was missing
> > causing an overflow bug when access was attempted in the get_event_name
> > function.
>
> These last two bugs are applicable to 2.6.17.
Correct.
>
> I'm kind of thinking of pushing all the TPM patches into 2.6.17 actually.
> Although there's quite a lot of feature work in there, we also have
> bugfixes, although relatively minor ones.
>
> What's your confidence level in those patches?
> Would you have time to do a decent round of regression testing against the
> resulting TPM code prior to 2.6.17? Say, inside the next couple of weeks?
I'm pretty confident. Yesterday's bug fixes were the last things I know
of that needed attention. I'd be happy to run regression testing in the
next couple of weeks.
Thanks,
Kylie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
