On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 10:23 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> It was just a suggestion, the bug might very well be just the size of
> the transfer itself and nothing SG related. All I can say for sure is
> that I'd be very surprised if this fs corruption isn't due to the
> hardware mangling the data for large transfers.
It sounds like this to me as well. The other problem might be some type
of segment boundary issue which are not uncommon on less capable DMA
engines. Either way, there's no question that large transfers work on
other hardware (SGI and IBM have extensively tested raising the current
128SG entries limit just so they could squeeze megabytes of data per
single command), so as Jens says, this is some type of issue within the
Areca hardware which you need to understand before the driver can be
made safe.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
