Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:33:24PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> The LSM interface is also being abused by several proprietary kernel 
> modules, some of which are not even security related.  In one case, 
> there's code which dangerously revectors SELinux with a shim layer 
> designed to try and bypass the GPL.  Some of this is a response to 
> unexporting the syscall table, where projects which abused that have now 
> switched to LSM.

I agree that this is happening today.  Which makes me wonder, why is the
variable "security_ops" exported through "EXPORT_SYMBOL()" and not
"EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()"?  It seems that people are taking advantage of
this and changing it would help slow them down a bit.

Chris, would you take a patch to change this?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux