Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/11] security: AppArmor - LSM interface

> +#ifndef MODULE
> +static int __init aa_getopt_complain(char *str)
> +{
> +	get_option(&str, &apparmor_complain);
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("apparmor_complain=", aa_getopt_complain);

this is just bogus; in 2.6 at least. No need for ifdef; module
parameters can be set on the kernel commandline for the non-module case



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
    • From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 3/11] security: AppArmor - LSM interface
    • From: Tony Jones <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2
• Next by Date: RE: Linux 2.6.17-rc2
• Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH 3/11] security: AppArmor - LSM interface
• Next by thread: [RFC][PATCH 6/11] security: AppArmor - Userspace interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]