Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack

Quoting Eric W. Biederman ([email protected]):
> Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Serge,
> >
> > can we do nothing with sysctls at this moment, instead of commiting hacks?
> 
> Except that we modify a static table changing the uts behaviour in
> proc_doutsstring isn't all that bad.
> 
> I'm just about to start on something more comprehensive, in
> the sysctl case.

So assuming that I take out the switch(), leaving that for a better
solution by Eric (or Dave, or whoever),

Is it time to ask for the utsname namespace patch to be tried out
in -mm?

thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: RE: [patch 1/3] acpi: dock driver
• Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH 1/11] security: AppArmor - Integrate into kbuild
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]