Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack

"Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]> writes:

> Quoting Kirill Korotaev ([email protected]):
>> Serge,
>> 
>> can we do nothing with sysctls at this moment, instead of commiting hacks?
>
> Please look closer at the patch.
>
> I *am* doing nothing with sysctls.
>
> system_utsname no longer exists, and the way to get to that is by using
> init_uts_ns.name.  That's all this does.

Ack.  I probably read that question backwards.

Yes you must at least touch kernel/sysctl.c when you kill
system_utsname.

I read it as: Can we do nothing better with sysctls that commiting hacks?

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: searching exported symbols from modules
• Next by Date: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]