Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)

On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 18:53 +0200, Gunther Mayer wrote:

> >
> Can you name the exact 8250 model which is buggy ?
> 

>From the spec:

COM1 und COM2 werden mittels der Ultra IO FDC37C675 implementiert. COM3
und COM4 sind 16C550 oder kompatible.


I'm using COM1 and COM2 so it's the Ultra IO FDC37C675.

-- Steve


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)
    • From: Gunther Mayer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17 regression: Very slow net transfer from some hosts
• Next by Date: Re: scx200_acb: Use PCI I/O resource when appropriate
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]