Re: libata-pata works on ICH4-M

Hello list,

>just a quick note to tell you that with ATA_ENABLE_PATA my
>system works fine and does even survive suspend-to-ram.
>This is a Samsung P35 laptop with one builtin 80 GB harddisk
>and one builtin DVD-RAM drive.
>libata patches are the ones included in 2.6.17-rc1-mm2 with
>an additional one-liner:
>
>ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0x1860 irq 14
>ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:346b 83:7f01 84:6003 85:3c69 86:3f01 87:6003 88:203f
>ata1: dev 0 ATA-7, max UDMA/100, 156368016 sectors: LBA48
>ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100
>scsi0 : ata_piix
>  Vendor: ATA       Model: SAMSUNG MP0804H   Rev: UE10
>  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 05
>SCSI device sda: 156368016 512-byte hdwr sectors (80060 MB)
[...]

So libata has the overhead of using SCSI commands? At least 
that's what it suggests to the normal user.



Jan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: libata-pata works on ICH4-M
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• References:
  • libata-pata works on ICH4-M
    • From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
• Next by Date: [PATCH] ftdi_sio: Adds support for iPlus device.
• Previous by thread: libata-pata works on ICH4-M
• Next by thread: Re: libata-pata works on ICH4-M
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]