Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel

Hi,

On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 04:47:18PM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> I'll be filing a FC5 performance bug for this but would like an opinion
>  from the IDE kernel people just in case this has already been seen...
> 
> I just upgraded my home K7-800, 512MB RAM box from FC3 to FC5
>  and noticed a disk performance slowdown while copying files around.

Just another suggestion: try eliminating/pinpointing I/O scheduler issues
(switch e.g. to "noop" at /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler and compare again)

Andreas Mohr
~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
    • From: "Alessandro Suardi" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
    • From: "Alessandro Suardi" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] uts namespaces: Introduction
• Next by Date: Re: dirty pages (Was: Re: [PATCH] Prevent large file writeback starvation)
• Previous by thread: Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
• Next by thread: Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]