While hunting down oversized inlines
I stumbled on tcf_generic_walker().
It is defined in two separate files:
once as an inline in include/net/pkt_act.h
(really big one, ~750 bytes of code)
and once as a static function in net/sched/act_police.c
These two instances are not identical.
Second one has one extra parameter (int type)
and it uses it like this:
for (i = 0; i < MY_TAB_SIZE; i++) {
p = tcf_police_ht[tcf_police_hash(i)];
for (; p; p = p->next) {
index++;
if (index < s_i)
continue;
a->priv = p;
a->order = index;
r = (struct rtattr*) skb->tail;
RTA_PUT(skb, a->order, 0, NULL);
+ if (type == RTM_DELACTION)
+ err = tcf_action_dump_1(skb, a, 0, 1);
+ else
+ err = tcf_action_dump_1(skb, a, 0, 0);
Having two functions with same name is rather confusing.
Worse, they are both are called via five different
tc_action_ops structs:
static struct tc_action_ops act_ipt_ops = {
...
.walk = tcf_generic_walker
and I fail to understand how it is supposed to work,
considering the fact that these two tcf_generic_walker's
have different prototypes.
1) What should I do with tcf_generic_walker?
2) Should I deinline huge inlines in include/net/pkt_act.h?
If yes, to which .c file should I move them?
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]