Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Herbert Rosmanith wrote:
> >  Feel free to use  any one of those.  The only commonly-available
> > mainline mechanism to  _trace_ and _intercept_ syscalls is ptrace.  
> 
> with the limitation of ptrace, -EPERM -- see above.

I guess I am dense, but what is already tracing this process?

Thanks,
Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall
    • From: Herbert Rosmanith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Issues with symbol names
• Next by Date: Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall
• Previous by thread: Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall
• Next by thread: Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]