[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kconfig question

To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>, Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: kconfig question
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:21:36 +0200
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-reply-to: <26F95EDB-C8BA-4FF0-A847-10D6D4255C4C@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <26F95EDB-C8BA-4FF0-A847-10D6D4255C4C@kernel.crashing.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Dunno, Roman?

	Sam

On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:50:04PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Sam,
> 
> Is there a way to have a set of choices either be mutual exclusive or  
> individually selectable depending on how some other Kconfig var is set?
> 
> - kumar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- kconfig question
  - From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc6] Promise SuperTrak driver
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers [try #6]
Previous by thread: kconfig question
Next by thread: System lockup with processes in D state in 2.6.16.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Submit] [Site Home] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Consulting] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [DVD Store] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]