Peter Chubb wrote:
"Shailabh" == Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]> writes:
Shailabh> To this list we can also add
Shailabh> Microstate accounting Peter Chubb
Shailabh> <[email protected]> I don't know if Peter is still
Shailabh> interested in pursuing this or it was rejected.
It's still maintained in a sporadic sort of way --- I update it when
either I need it for something, or someone's downloaded it and asks
why it doesn't work agains kernel X.Y.Z. I see a few downloads a
month.
So do you intend to pursue acceptance ? If so, do you think the
netlink-based taskstats
interface provided by the delay accounting patches could be an
acceptable substitute for the
interfaces you had (from an old lkml post, they appear to be
/proc/tgid/msa and a syscall
based one) ?
My microstate accounting patch overlaps the delay accounting patch quite a
lot in functionality, (but I thnk mine is cleaner except for interrupt
time accounting... which the delay accounting patch doesn't do. I
wanted to know how much time a thread *really* had on the processor,
subtracting off the time spent in interrupt handlers for some other
process).
Thanks. Will incorporate into a note on the mechanisms of the other
accounting patches.
--Shailabh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
