Re: [PATCH][RFC] splice support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 30 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:53:46 +0200
> Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > I don't know about sendfile() but this looks client can hold server's
> > > memory, when server uses sendfile() 64k/conn.
> > 
> > You mean when the server uses splice, 64kb (well 16 pages actually) /
> > connection? That's a correct observation, I wouldn't think that pinning
> > that small a number of pages is likely to cause any issues. At least I
> > can think of much worse pinning by just doing IO :-)
> > 
> My point is consumer can sleep forever and pages are pinnded forever.
> And people who use splice() will not notice they are pinning pages.
> 
> But as you say, it's not problem in usual situation.
> Maybe I'm too pessimistic how my cusomers play with Linux ;)

It's a valid concern, however as mentioned there's a number of ways in
which a user can pin memory already. Perhaps this general problem should
be capped elsewhere?

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux