Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-git] defines MMU mode specific syscalls as 'cond_syscall' and clean-up unneeded macros

"Hyok S. Choi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> (BTW, I could not guess what part of my previous mail was mangled. I found no 
>  problem when I got the patch from the mailing-list, by gmail?)

It looks like your email client did RFC2464(?) space-stuffing.  Perhaps
your client unstuffs too (if that's possible), in which case you wouldn't
see it.

I don't know, but I'm sure I'm about to find out ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.16-git] defines MMU mode specific syscalls as 'cond_syscall' and clean-up unneeded macros
    • From: "Hyok S. Choi" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-git] defines MMU mode specific syscalls as 'cond_syscall' and clean-up unneeded macros
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-git] defines MMU mode specific syscalls as 'cond_syscall' and clean-up unneeded macros
    • From: "Hyok S. Choi" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Correction: 2.6.16-git12 killed networking -- 3c900 card
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] splice support
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-git] defines MMU mode specific syscalls as 'cond_syscall' and clean-up unneeded macros
• Next by thread: mark_bh in Linux 2.6.12 kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]