Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps

* Sam Vilain ([email protected]) wrote:
> This raises a very interesting question. All those LSM globals,
> shouldn't those be virtualisable, too? After all, isn't it natural to
> want to apply a different security policy to different sets of processes?

Which globals?  Policy could be informed by relevant containers.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Herbert Poetzl <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
  - From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and module vermagic
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm2] Kconfig SND_SEQUENCER_OSS help text fix
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]