Re: PI patch against 2.6.16-rt9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:

> Btw, your get/put_task proposal adds two atomic ops. Atomic ops are 
> implicit memory barriers and therefor you add two extra slow downs 
> into the non conflict case.

i'm not that worried about this - the atomic ops are for already cached 
cachelines, any sane CPU ought to execute them close to full speed.  
(x86-ish cpus certainly do)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux