Re: mark_bh in Linux 2.6.12 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Here is the source

static __inline__ void usbd_schedule_device_bh(struct usb_device_instance *device)
{
if (device && (device->status != USBD_CLOSING) && !device->device_bh.sync) {
       queue_task(&device->device_bh, &tq_immediate);
       mark_bh(IMMEDIATE_BH);
   }
}

Also,in the below code, will replacing "schedule_task" simply by "schedule_work" work? static __inline__ void usbd_schedule_function_bh(struct usb_device_instance *device)
{
if (device && (device->status != USBD_CLOSING) && !device->function_bh.sync) {
   schedule_task(&device->function_bh);
   }

---- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Ravnborg" <[email protected]>
To: "shiva g" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: mark_bh in Linux 2.6.12 kernel


On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 04:12:43PM +0530, shiva g wrote:
Hi all,
We are porting a usb host controller driver from 2.4.18 kernel to 2.6.12
kernel. We face some issues with
mark_bh( ) call. Can anyone suggest us how we proceed in porting mark_bh( )
in the 2.6.12 kernel.
Posting the source may give you more/better feedback...

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux