Re: Save 320K on production machines?

>   True, but that's the point.  People break into systems with
> passwords.  Just because passwords aren't 100% effective in
> protecting systems doesn't mean we don't use them.  :-)
>

yepp, in the end it always boils down to pebkac. :-]



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Save 320K on production machines?
    • From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
  • Re: Save 320K on production machines?
    • From: Andre Tomt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Save 320K on production machines?
    • From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Random GCC segfaults -- Was: [2.6.16] slab error in slab_destroy_objs(): cache `radix_tree_node'...
• Next by Date: Re: Random GCC segfaults -- Was: [2.6.16] slab error in slab_destroy_objs(): cache `radix_tree_node'...
• Previous by thread: Re: Save 320K on production machines?
• Next by thread: [PATCH] autofs4 - atomic var underflow - obvious programming error
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]