so IMHO, we should make a kernel branch (Eric or Sam
are probably willing to maintain that), which we keep
in-sync with mainline (not necessarily git, but at
least snapshot wise), where we put all the patches
we agree on, and each party should then adjust the
existing solution to this kernel, so we get some deep
testing in the process, and everybody can see if it
'works' for him or not ...
ACK. A collection of patches that we can all agree
on sounds like something worth aiming for.
It looks like Kirill last round of patches can form
a nucleus for that. So far I have seem plenty of technical
objects but no objections to the general direction.
yup, I will fix everything and will come with a set of patches for IPC,
so we could select which way is better to do it :)
So agreement appears possible.
Nice to hear this!
Eric, we have a GIT repo on openvz.org already:
http://git.openvz.org
we will create a separate branch also called -acked, where patches
agreed upon will go.
Thanks,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
