Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c: less PROC_FS=n #ifdef's

On Ne 26-03-06 14:25:04, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I'm surprised that kill-ifdefs-in-mtdcorec.patch in -mm that removes
> #ifdef's for the PROC_FS=n case wasn't tested with PROC_FS=n...

Sorry for that, I somehow assumed it was trivial and did not test it
properly.
								Pavel

-- 
Picture of sleeping (Linux) penguin wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c: less PROC_FS=n #ifdef's
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [GIT] overall system responsiveness / ALSA partly broken
• Next by Date: Re: unlock_buffer() and clear_bit()
• Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c: less PROC_FS=n #ifdef's
• Next by thread: [2.6 patch] CONFIGFS_FS must depend on SYSFS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]