From: Norbert Kiesel <[email protected]>
Just noticed that request_sock.[ch] contain a useless assignment of
rskq_accept_head to itself. I assume this is a typo and the 2nd one
was supposed to be _tail. However, setting _tail to NULL is not
needed, so the patch below just drops the 2nd assignment.
Signed-Off-By: Norbert Kiesel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
---
This patch was sent by Norbert Kiesel on:
- 5 Mar 2006
diff -ru a/include/net/request_sock.h b/include/net/request_sock.h
--- a/include/net/request_sock.h 2005-10-28 15:44:45.000000000 -0700
+++ b/include/net/request_sock.h 2006-03-05 15:22:33.000000000 -0800
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
{
struct request_sock *req = queue->rskq_accept_head;
- queue->rskq_accept_head = queue->rskq_accept_head = NULL;
+ queue->rskq_accept_head = NULL;
return req;
}
diff -ru a/net/core/request_sock.c b/net/core/request_sock.c
--- a/net/core/request_sock.c 2006-03-05 14:40:50.000000000 -0800
+++ b/net/core/request_sock.c 2006-03-05 15:23:11.000000000 -0800
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
get_random_bytes(&lopt->hash_rnd, sizeof(lopt->hash_rnd));
rwlock_init(&queue->syn_wait_lock);
- queue->rskq_accept_head = queue->rskq_accept_head = NULL;
+ queue->rskq_accept_head = NULL;
lopt->nr_table_entries = nr_table_entries;
write_lock_bh(&queue->syn_wait_lock);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
