Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/24/06, Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here are interbench numbers for a pentium4 HT with 2.6.16-ck1 and 2.6.16-mm1
>
> The rules I use for flagging diffferences are:
> 1. Deadlines met is the primary endpoint.
> 2. When latency is out of bounds, what is the worst max latency as that will
> be the most noticeable jerkiness, stutter etc, but I only flag them if at
> least one value is >=7ms since that is required to be human perceptible.
>
> Using 2036365 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
> Benchmarking kernel 2.6.16-ck1 at datestamp 200603250244
>
> --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
> Load    Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
> None      0.015 +/- 0.0159     0.023             100            100
> Video     0.757 +/- 0.881          2             100            100
> X         0.051 +/- 0.189       1.02             100            100
> Burn      0.019 +/- 0.0201     0.056 *           100            100 *
> Write     0.055 +/- 0.344       4.83             100            100
> Read      0.024 +/- 0.0251     0.064             100            100
> Compile    0.03 +/- 0.0888      1.69             100            100
> Memload   0.321 +/- 4.94         112            99.8           99.8
>
> --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
> Load    Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
> None      0.016 +/- 0.0162     0.028             100            100
> X         0.043 +/- 0.17        2.01 *           100            100 *
> Burn      0.188 +/- 2.33        45.3 *          99.6           99.2 *
> Write     0.043 +/- 0.558       16.7 *           100           99.9 *
> Read      0.021 +/- 0.0217     0.078 *           100            100
> Compile   0.093 +/- 1.08        18.4 *           100           99.6 *
> Memload   0.385 +/- 4.83         138            98.9           98.3 *
>
> --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
> Load    Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
> None      0.026 +/- 0.356          6 *           100             99 *
> Video        14 +/- 26.5          72 *          35.6           26.5 *
> Burn       51.4 +/- 98.4         456 *          15.1           7.91 *
> Write      2.19 +/- 6.65          36 *          78.6           71.1
> Read      0.756 +/- 3.33          24 *          90.6             86
> Compile    34.5 +/- 53.8         165 *          20.7           11.6 *
> Memload    4.05 +/- 12.6          80            73.3           66.8
>
> --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
> Load    Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU
> None       1.49 +/- 6.03        34.8 *          98.5 *
> Video      68.7 +/- 68.9          74 *          59.3
> X          60.7 +/- 70.6         143            62.2
> Burn        514 +/- 534          602 *          16.3
> Write      20.6 +/- 31.4         109 *          82.9
> Read       7.77 +/- 9.04        31.3            92.8
> Compile     436 +/- 459          697 *          18.7
> Memload    27.1 +/- 58.3         755            78.7 *
>
>
>
> Using 2036365 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
> Benchmarking kernel 2.6.16-mm1 at datestamp 200603250939
>
> --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
> Load    Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
> None      0.012 +/- 0.0121     0.023             100            100
> Video      1.16 +/- 1.24        2.01             100            100
> X         0.302 +/- 0.681       2.01             100            100
> Burn      0.365 +/- 8.63         211            99.7           99.7
> Write     0.017 +/- 0.0193     0.072             100            100
> Read       0.02 +/- 0.0209     0.056             100            100
> Compile   0.019 +/- 0.0196     0.046             100            100
> Memload   0.092 +/- 0.623         11 *           100 *          100 *
>
> --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
> Load    Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
> None      0.011 +/- 0.0114      0.04             100            100
> X         0.885 +/- 3.73        18.7             100           95.8
> Burn      0.977 +/- 22.6         934            98.4           95.9
> Write     0.047 +/- 0.789       23.7             100           99.8
> Read      0.017 +/- 0.0181     0.058             100            100
> Compile     1.6 +/- 17.6         370            96.5           94.5
> Memload   0.501 +/- 3.48        44.4 *          98.9           97.4
>
> --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
> Load    Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
> None      0.255 +/- 2.25          27            94.1           93.3
> Video      14.8 +/- 27.7          76            34.8           25.5
> Burn       39.4 +/- 75.6         505            13.1           7.07
> Write       1.6 +/- 6.17          48            78.7           74.9 *
> Read      0.709 +/- 3.26          30            91.2             88 *
> Compile    42.9 +/- 80.5         667            11.3           5.61
> Memload    2.23 +/- 7.24          42 *          71.4           66.8
>
> --- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
> Load    Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU
> None       5.31 +/- 19           123              95
> Video      69.8 +/- 70.1        80.1            58.9 *
> X          60.3 +/- 70.3         120 *          62.4
> Burn        295 +/- 310          710            25.3 *
> Write      17.3 +/- 30.8         110            85.2 *
> Read       5.64 +/- 6.45        20.3 *          94.7 *
> Compile     392 +/- 420          713            20.3
> Memload    27.8 +/- 47.8         430 *          78.3
>
>
> Summary:
>         Deadlines       Max Latencies
>         ck      mm      ck      mm
> Audio   1       1       1       1
> Video   5       0       5       1
> X       4       2       6       1
> Game    2       4       5       3
>
> Note that most of the differences between -ck and -mm on this benchmark are
> due to the staircase cpu scheduler in -ck. It has staircase v14.2 as recently
> posted to the mailing list.
>
> Cheers,
> Con

I just tried  2.6.16-mm1 with Mike Galbraith patches and it feels
better in some situations (like opening a new tab inside konqueror or
running a configure script ) but it gave some
stops when playing amarok/gstreamer and doing regular desktop work.

Best regards,
--
[]s,

André Goddard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux