SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED

Hi,
I noticed you recently changed the way you handle SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED macro.
Former version was something like that:

#define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \
	(spinlock_t) { { __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) } }

while current version is:

# define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED \
	(spinlock_t) { { __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED } }

I noticed your 2.6.16-rt6 patch includes two calls to
SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) macro, the first one in
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c and the last one in
include/asm-powerpc/rwsem.h.
Is this the right behaviour?

Regards,

--
Luca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-rc6-xen] export Xen Hypervisor attributes to sysfs
• Next by Date: [PATCH] PCI Error Recovery: e1000 network device driver
• Previous by thread: Add a field to task_struct
• Next by thread: Re: SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]