Re: delay_tsc(): inefficient delay loop (2.6.16-mm1)

Andreas Mohr wrote:
>
>  	rdtscl(bclock);
> +	/* offset with bclock to have very simple comparison below */
> +	loops += bclock;
>  	do {
>  		rep_nop();
>  		rdtscl(now);
> -	} while ((now-bclock) < loops);
> +	} while (now < loops);
>  }

Hehe, optimizing delay loops *g*  But your optimization is
wrong.  'loops+bclock' and/or 'now' is likely to wrap around
and then the test condition becomes bogus.

Ciao, ET.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • delay_tsc(): inefficient delay loop (2.6.16-mm1)
    • From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Virtualization of IPC
• Next by Date: Re: delay_tsc(): inefficient delay loop (2.6.16-mm1)
• Previous by thread: Re: delay_tsc(): inefficient delay loop (2.6.16-mm1)
• Next by thread: [RFC] Virtualization steps
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]