Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I agree it probably may be improved. Still it seems to be good enough. Further,
it's more efficient than the previous solution, so I consider it as an improvement.
Also this code has been tested for quite some time in -mm and appears to
behave properly, at least we haven't got any bug reports related to it so far.
I find the in-kernel swsusp to be quite slow, and it seems to use
an awful lot of memory for book-keeping. So count that as encouragement
to improve the performance when you can.
Currently I'm not working on any better solution. If you can provide any
patches to implement one, please submit them, but I think they'll have to be
tested for as long as this code, in -mm.
It would be *really nice* if you guys could stop being so underhandedly
nasty in every single reply to anything from Nigel.
He really is trying to help, you know.
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
