Linus Torvalds wrote (ao): > > I was not able to let 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 crash yet. > > > > I'll test 2.6.16-rc6-mm1 now. > > Yup, narrowing down where exactly things go south is the way to do it. 2.6.16-rc6-mm1 is as stable as 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 with my simple testcase. Is there a quick patch to suspect, or should I narrow down some more per Andrew's instructions? -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- References:
- [git patch append] sata_mv fix
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- From: Sander <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- From: Sander <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- From: Sander <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [git patch append] sata_mv fix
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ext2/3: Support 2^32-1 blocks(Kernel)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] - Move call to calc_load()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
- Index(es):
 |