On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:13:36AM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:00:38PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > platform_get_irq*() cannot return 0 on error as 0 is a valid IRQ on some
> > platforms, return -ENXIO instead.
>
> 0 is NO_IRQ, and can not be a valid IRQ number, ever. A
> platform_get_irq*() returning 0 as a valid irq is buggy.
>
> Check http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/211
No. That's Linus' _opinion_, which is not applicable to systems without
the obviously broken PCI or ISA busses. On such systems, IRQ0 has no
special meaning what so ever.
Greg - please continue sending this patch.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
