Re: [PATCH 010 of 13] md: Only checkpoint expansion progress occasionally.

NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> diff ./drivers/md/raid5.c~current~ ./drivers/md/raid5.c
>  --- ./drivers/md/raid5.c~current~	2006-03-17 11:48:58.000000000 +1100
>  +++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c	2006-03-17 11:48:58.000000000 +1100
>  @@ -1747,8 +1747,9 @@ static int make_request(request_queue_t 

That's a fairly complex function..

I wonder about this:

	spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
	if (--bi->bi_phys_segments == 0) {
		int bytes = bi->bi_size;

		if ( bio_data_dir(bi) == WRITE )
			md_write_end(mddev);
		bi->bi_size = 0;
		bi->bi_end_io(bi, bytes, 0);
	}
	spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);

bi_end_io() can be somewhat expensive.  Does it need to happen under the lock?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 000 of 13] md: Introduction
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 010 of 13] md: Only checkpoint expansion progress occasionally.
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 006 of 13] md: Infrastructure to allow normal IO to continue while array is expanding.
• Next by Date: Re: Kernel Oops-jprobe
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 010 of 13] md: Only checkpoint expansion progress occasionally.
• Next by thread: [PATCH 012 of 13] md: Make 'reshape' a possible sync_action action.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]