Re: [RFC, PATCH 14/24] i386 Vmi reboot fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Zachary Amsden <[email protected]> writes:
Huh?  Rebooting through the BIOS and kexec are pretty much mutually exclusive.
Looking at the patch I can't see what you are talking about either.

Let me rephrase - kexec doesn't define calls for machine_shutdown and others that are in arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c. So kexec requires BIOS reboot code to be compiled in, even though the usage of the two is mutually exclusive.

Does kexec successfully work under VMWare?

It should work just fine. But it could expose bugs on either end. I've been monitoring our kexec testing, and I'll be able to help you with any issues that we might find on the Linux side. :)

machine_halt does not want to stop the processor.  It is very much
about killing the kernel and user space but having the software still
linger a little.

I was afraid of that. I can back that change out. The problem I had was that the shutdown code I was running in userspace would not make the syscalls to actually call machine_power_off, but machine_halt instead. Will fix.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux