Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wright wrote:
* Zachary Amsden ([email protected]) wrote:
+static void fixup_translation(struct vmi_annotation *a)
+{
+	unsigned char *c, *start, *end;
+	int left;
+
+	memcpy(a->nativeEIP, a->translationEIP, a->translation_size);
+	start = a->nativeEIP;
+	end = a->nativeEIP + a->translation_size;
+
+	for (c = start; c < end;) {
+		switch(*c) {
+			case MNEM_CALL_NEAR:

Why these restrictions?  How do you do int $0x82, for example?

We don't. This is the minimal set of instructions that are emitted during the annotation. The instruction sequence is only sufficient to call out to the hypervisor ROM.

What we want to do next is to allow the hypervisor itself to do this code fixup - in effect, relinking in the local translations, which in many cases would then convert to int $0x82 for inline Xen calls.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux