Re: PATCH: rio driver rework continued #2

On Mer, 2006-03-15 at 17:33 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >  	rio_dprintk(RIO_DEBUG_PARAM, "can_add_transmit() returns %x\n", res);
> > -	rio_dprintk(RIO_DEBUG_PARAM, "Packet is 0x%x\n", (int) PacketP);
> > +	rio_dprintk(RIO_DEBUG_PARAM, "Packet is 0x%p\n", PacketP);
> 						^^^^
> 
> Just %p.

Thanks .. good point. Will go whack all those on the head once I've
finished this batch of changes to remove even more typedefery

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • PATCH: rio driver rework continued #2
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: PATCH: rio driver rework continued #2
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6
• Next by Date: [2.6.16-rc6-m1 PATCH] Connector: Filesystem Events Connector
• Previous by thread: Re: PATCH: rio driver rework continued #2
• Next by thread: PATCH: rio driver rework continued #4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]